And there will be blood…..

Posted in Uncategorized on July 13th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

Our nearest neighbours, just across the ditch the Australians have a penchant for “a bit o the biff” (must be the convict ancestry) and they are showing no signs of that stopping in the world of copyright holders vs ISP’s as mentioned here on TorrentFreak.

AFACT are literally taking the gloves off an by all accounts the ISP’s have their backs up.

A judge in a recent case suggested that “customers should be warned that an infringement has taken place via their account and they should be given a certain time, say 7 days, to respond to the allegation. If no response should arrive then the ISP could suspend the account until one does. During the case itself, the Judge suggested going even further for repeat infringers.”

The Australian entertainment industry is very healthy and a LOT of money changes hands their even by world standards.

As mentioned the Aussies like a good fight and we can only see there will be blood split over this.

Ringside seat anyone…?

 

The cost of a hit song

Posted in Uncategorized on July 3rd, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

The good people at NPR in the US has a recent look at how much it costs to create a hit song in the US

You can read their post in full here but the bit that got us was this:

But it’s not a hit until everybody hears it. How much does that cost?

About $1 million, according to Daniels, Riddick and other industry insiders.

“The reason it costs so much,” Daniels says, “is because I need everything to click at once. You want them to turn on the radio and hear Rihanna, turn on BET and see Rihanna, walk down the street and see a poster of Rihanna, look on Billboard, the iTunes chart, I want you to see Rihanna first. All of that costs.”

That’s what a hit song is: It’s everywhere you look. To get it there, the label pays.

Every song is different. Some songs have a momentum all their own, some songs just break out out of the blue. But the record industry depends on hits for sales. Having hits is the business plan. The majority of songs that are hits — that chart high, that sell big, that blast out of cars in the summertime— cost a million bucks to get them heard and played and bought.

Daniels breaks down the expenses roughly into thirds: a third for marketing, a third to fly the artist everywhere, and a third for radio.

“Marketing and radio are totally different,” he says. “Marketing is street teams, commercials and ads.”

Radio is?

“Radio you’re talking about . . .” he pauses. “Treating the radio guys nice.”

So $1MM plus to maybe get a radio hit in the USA. No guarantees there either.

Isnt there something missing here…?

The fan base

The people who bought the first album, the ones who want more…?

Perhaps its just too hard to consult them…

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teenage brains and music

Posted in Uncategorized on June 23rd, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

We spoke with a journalism student about this today:

http://esciencecommons.blogspot.com/2011/06/teen-brain-data-predicts-pop-song.html

The thing that struck us about this was that we think that being inside an MRI scanner listening to music is about as far from a shared musical experience that one can get. By all accounts they are very noisy (The MRI’s that is – not the teenagers although they too have the propensity) and hearing music is a common distractor the operators use.

Perhaps when the technology means we can all wear an MRI at the same time then maybe the scans might mean something (and we have no doubt that some people are working on this already), but for now despite what the scans say, for us, that deeply human desire to share kinda overrides some lovely colours on the scan read out.

And… Do we really want to know why we like something and wouldn’t that spoil the joy of discovery somehow….?

It also made us think of the TV show Mad Men and the group testing they did on dog food and cigarette brands.

Sample away science-geek-folk, its just never that simple.

Why…? Well we just like this graphic, and

Posted in Uncategorized on June 14th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

it shows that in our digital driven world there are some lovers of warm analogue sounds out there. These figures which are from the Recording Industry Association of America via the good people at digitalmusicnews, reflect what is going on in our neck of the woods too. Both Monkey Killer Records and Fishrider Records here in Dunedin have released vinyl in the last 12 months. Good stuff.

Specifically, 2010 receipts – after returns – were $87.0 million, compared to $15.7 million in 2006.   And, keep in mind, this also counts indie-focused distributors, owned by major label groups.  Which makes sense, because indies are driving a lot of this action.  Here’s the breakdown, in both units and revenues (in millions, all net post-returns):

  • 2006: 0.9 million units; $15.7 million revenue
  • 2007: 1.3 million units; $22.9 million
  • 2008: 2.9 million units; $56.7 million
  • 2009: 3.2 million units; $60.2 million
  • 2010: 4.0 million units; $87.2 million

Posted in Uncategorized on June 13th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

Interesting article on raising capital from digitalmusicnews

The Lessons I Learned from a $10,000 Kickstarter Campaign…

Caren Kelleher is the manager of unsigned bands True Mad North and The Lighthouse and the Whaler. She is also the business development lead at Songkick and an HBS grad to boot. Here, she talks about some surprising lessons learned while raising $10,200 in Kickstarter cash for Lighthouse.

In 1792, Ludwig van Beethoven was out of cash, living at home, and working a day job.

Though he had been an apprentice to the great musicians of Vienna and was even declared “the new Mozart” by the Magazine of Music, Beethoven had yet to find a constant revenue stream to support his career.

Lucky for Ludwig, some noblemen in Vienna recognized his talent and came to the rescue, offering patronage in the form of grants, just as aristocrats did for Renaissance artists.  In those days there were no record labels fighting to sign Beethoven, nor publishers interested in royalties; instead there were just some influential fans that had an interest in keeping this musician around – and spreading their considerable cultural influence.

Today, as we watch the labels shift and recorded revenue streams dry up, the idea of patronage has resurfaced.  Platforms like Kickstarter and Pledge Music market themselves as direct financing engines and have helped artists raise some serious cash.  And this can work: I just raised more than $10,000 on Kickstarter, but not before learning some surprising lessons.

1) Fans often want influence, not swag.

Early patronage came around when music was a cultural, not capitalistic, undertaking.  Even now, when bands can offer recordings, t-shirts and collectibles, early fans are still in it for the influence, not the swag.

Consider a sample of thirty recently-successful music projects on Kickstarter.  In comparing the number of backers against pledge packages selected and dollars raised, it turns out that 30% of funding came from backers that did not select merchandise packages to match their pledge amounts.  In other words, one-third of each successful Kickstarter project came from fans that either didn’t want stuff, or bought it separately on their own.  It turns out that superfans simply aren’t that motivated by merch.

That would explain the frustrating results for a number of fan-funded start-ups built on incentives.  They offer things like stock options, exclusive merchandise, and access to artists.  But nothing has really taken off, because that is not why fans generally lend support.  If fans were motivated by finances or freebies, they would be in the music business.

2) You need big donors.

Beethoven may have collected tips in Viennese cafes, but those micropayments didn’t finance great symphonies.  Likewise, promising musicians will not build careers on micropayments alone; they will require larger individual investments from modern-day patrons. This is already happening, whether or not artists are aware of it.

It is hard to derive real insight from the successes of d-to-c financing campaigns, absent case studies. Yet one artist recently told me that he received a $2,000 Kickstarter pledge from a man who wanted Executive Producer credits, even though that was not an advertised pledge package.  I have also met former industry executives and financiers who are now operating as cultural investors, just like Viennese aristocrats of Beethoven’s day.  But these days, the motivations could be philanthropic, cultural, or part of a strategic career move.

3) Most fans won’t donate, no matter how hard you try.

This is the hardest thing to get over.  But unless an artist discovers himself to be the Pied Piper and mesmerizes everyone within earshot, artists of the future will find it increasingly difficult to compete for fans’ attention and wallet-share. This will be especially true as more and more artists pursue the same financing routes and overwhelm fans with the same call to action.

Consider the numbers I encountered.  Just 1.3% of The Lighthouse and the Whaler’s online fans contributed to our Kickstarter campaign – a good response rate were it a traditional direct marketing campaign.  But few DIY bands would know that to be normal.  The consequence is that many will look at their Facebook or MySpace fan counts and overestimate how much money they can raise.

Yet this is ultimately the wrong number game.  Not all fans are created equal, yet history has shown that it takes just a few important fans to make a huge difference. The artists that recognize this will differentiate themselves, at least when it comes to financing.

Join the discussion at:
http://digitalmusicnews.com/stories/060811funding

Where might the indies belong in the cloud?

Posted in Uncategorized on June 7th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

Charles Caldas the CEO of MERLIN sounds off in Billboard about the indies place in the new cloud based music delivery services.

I guess what we are seeing here is fairly typical of those that domiante the market – in both computing and content provision, and one cant blame them – it’s their job to make money for their own companies, but as Mr Caldas notes “Ownership of master recordings, not distribution, should be used to calculate market share”

We think it could be quite perilous for the delivery companies to ignore the indies.

In fact we are almost certain they are not being ignored, but when there are 2500+ music aggregators for one major delivery service alone, world wide it must be both very tempting and very easy to deal with the ones who have both the largest catalogues and the best (most expensive) lawyers.

In today’s world where its all about “think global act local” and people are searching for genuine connection and collaboration, Coca Cola hasnt stopped selling BUT there are a plethora of other options out there.

Take a look at these (2009) stats:

Just saying….

Now the UN is involved….

Posted in Uncategorized on May 20th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

Tech Day is reporting that the UN are unhappy with disconnection of internet by sovereign states as it violate human rights. Hmmmm.

This conversation/war/discussion/situation is bigger than just the music industry or the film industry for that matter, and no doubt we wont be seeing a thoroughly workable settlement in the near future. Over at TED Johanna Blakely mentions music and copyright in an interesting way in relation to her talk on the clothing industry.

Worth watching….

Lovely warm vinyl

Posted in Uncategorized on May 19th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

Neilsen Soundscan are predicting some substantial growth in vinyl record sales in the US over the rest of this year, to the point where it accounts for 1.6% (or about 3.5 million records) of total music sold there.

We like vinyl, its got a nice ambient warmth and just yesterday purchased a local bands 12″ EP. The local label Monkey Killer Records teamed up with another NZ label Muzai to make this happen. We paid NZ$40 for the privilege of owning number 25 of a limited run of 100 records.

We know the labels arent making truckloads out of this and essentially its a labour of love for them but it IS  a very good way of monetising your true fans.

 

Making Tracks

Posted in Uncategorized on May 17th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

NZ On Air has recently launched its new music funding scheme – Making Tracks – the title chosen rather cheekily from the clever  TV Show fronted by Nick Dwyer. Not a bad call to name it after something successful, we think.

There has been some good reaction some negative comments and seemingly from where we sit a form of cautious optimism from lots of different levels within the NZ Music Industry.

The scheme replaces the new album and recording funding schemes and is a reaction to the Caddick report (which we had the opportunity to contribute to in a small way).

We were fortunate enough to have a face to face sit down with the NZOA Music Managers on the day of the launch and to be blunt they answered our questions and concerns well, and are coming from a place of passion about the music produced in New Zealand (something which we share), and meeting their needs to broadcast in this rapidly changing delivery environment.

There have been complaints about this not going far enough, but for us taxpayers we think it really is quite a good step forward.

Its good to see and understand the thought that has gone in to this project. The media release tells us that “We are trying something new” and “We will review the changes” and “fine tune” which is great from our perspective. This is a definite step in the right direction and to be open to change in today’s mad music delivery ecosystem is not only a good thing, its THE ONLY thing to be.

The other good thing to come from this, we think, is the criteria which, for us, forms part of a really really good base for today’s artists to develop their careers. To have to strategically think about building your fan base, and planning to get to a certain level of music sold (and measure and prove that fact), and saving some cash for a mid term goal is something we see as endemically lacking among the artists of today.

It really is an ecosystem and understanding that its not just “about the music” but about relationship building, fanbase development and foresight is another good (probably serendipitous) aspect to what this scheme can potentially deliver.

They also say they are aiming to:

  • Increase Diversity in funded music.
  • Promote widespread awareness of funded music.
  • Provide music for different audiences on a broader range of media platforms.

Good.

Digital initiatives are next in NZOA the plans (Govt funding cuts notwithstanding) and for us this will be the really interesting part….

 

Four to become three, and the ultimate consumer…?

Posted in Uncategorized on May 17th, 2011 by Scott – View Comments

Leonard Blavatnik the Russian American billionaire who purchased Warner Music Group last week via his Access Industries organisation for $3.3 billion is reportedly now in discussions EMI with about a possible purchase.

Blavatniks company Access Industries already owns quite a large media empire and if they end up owning EMI 75% of the worlds music will be controlled by just 3 companies. Universal, Sony and Access.

Now, with Sony and Universal already in control of  A LOT of the worlds media/technology it stands to reason Mr B would want to do the same. Controlling the content and the delivery method is a VERY clever method of making money.

Accoring to wikipedia Access industries own these media/tech companies along with the petrochemical empire:

Acision

In 2007, Access acquired a stake in Acision, the market leader in messaging solutions for mobile operators worldwide. Acision has over 300 mobile operators as customers who serve over a billion end users. Over 50 per cent of global messaging traffic is generated through Acision’s platforms. The company employs approximately 1,700 people in 22 countries across six continents.

Top Up TV

In late 2003, Access acquired a controlling stake in Top Up TV which launched in March 2004 on Freeview, Britain’s Digital Terrestrial TV platform. Top Up TV broadcasts a range of channels including: British Eurosport, UKTV Gold, Discovery Channel, TCM, Cartoon Network, Discovery Real Time, UKTV Food, and Bloomberg.

Ice.net

Access invested in Ice.net in 2009. Ice.net is a telecom services provider offering mobile broadband in Scandinavia. By deploying 3G-technology in lower frequencies the company has the largest geographical footprint of all scandinavian operators and approx, 100.000 subscribers.